Skip to content

Hub Access Overview

There are multiple ways to access the JupyterHub depending on your workflow preferences. You can:

  • Access the Hub directly through a web browser
  • Connect to the Hub using VSCode on your local machine
  • Use a VSCode interface inside JupyterLab via a built-in extension

This page can help you decide which method is right for you based on your workflow.

Method Best For
Browser (JupyterLab) New users, teaching, notebooks, simple experiments
VS Code inside the Hub Repo + notebook workflows, richer IDE, no setup
Local VS Code IDE Power users who want full desktop performance & features

Method Comparison

1. Browser (JupyterLab / Web UI)

Pros

  • Fastest onboarding, works from any machine
  • Zero local setup or install
  • Guaranteed environment parity with Hub compute
  • Ideal for teaching, workshops, quick data exploration

Cons

  • Not a full IDE (limited refactoring, UX, extensions)
  • Multi-file repo workflows can feel clunky
  • Fewer features compared to VS Code

Use-cases

  • First-time users, classes, tutorials
  • Notebook-centric workflows
  • Reliable & consistent shared environments

See installation instructions here: Access via Web Browser

2. VS Code Inside the Hub (browser-based VS Code extension)

Pros

  • Rich IDE in your browser tab
  • No SSH setup or config
  • Full access to your Hub environment (same kernel, filesystem, terminal)
  • Easier repo navigation, Git workflows, split views, terminal + notebooks side-by-side

Cons

  • Some extensions may be disabled/unavailable
  • Slight lag in slower networks
  • Not as fully integrated as local VS Code

Use-cases

  • Daily IDE-like workflows on Hub compute
  • Working with both notebooks and scripts in one place
  • Collaborative work on shared repos

See installation instructions here: Access VSCode inside the Hub

3. Local VS Code IDE Connected to the Hub

Pros

  • Richest developer experience (UI, extensions, keybindings)
  • Ideal for long sessions and power-user workflows
  • Full VS Code features, debugging, linting, Git integrations

Cons

  • Setup can be fragile (SSH, token config, port-forwarding)
  • Easy to mistakenly use your local interpreter/kernel
  • Credentials or data may unintentionally end up stored locally
  • More complex to support in classrooms/workshops

Use-cases

  • Power users comfortable with remote dev tools
  • Working on large codebases or long-running services
  • Custom local workflows that the Hub can’t support directly

See installation instructions here: Access via VSCode (external)

Installing Packages & Environment Behavior

Behavior Browser / VS Code in Hub Local VS Code IDE
Where packages install On the Hub compute Depends on interpreter—can be local or remote
Persistence across server restarts Yes, if installed in $HOME or Conda env Same, if using remote interpreter
Common pitfall None Accidentally installing locally instead of on the Hub

Note

Go to Managing Software for more guidance on installing packages.

Security & Data Movement

  • Browser and in-Hub VS Code: data stays on the Hub unless explicitly downloaded
  • Local VS Code IDE: easier to accidentally sync data to your local machine or expose secrets via cached credentials

Tip

You can switch between methods at any time - no need to stick to one - All methods access the same files in your Hub home directory